Happy for a fan base that has waited longer than ours.
— Jon Weisman (@jonweisman) November 2, 2015
Congrats to Kansas City. With apologies for creating a false dichotomy, whose past 27 seasons (1989-2015) would you rather have, those of the Royals or those of the Dodgers?
— Jon Weisman
Comments are closed.
What happens when three old friends in crisis fall into an unexpected love triangle? In The Catch, Maya, Henry and Daniel embark upon an emotional journey that forces them to confront unresolved pain, present-day traumas and powerful desires, leading them to question the very meaning of love and fulfillment. The Catch tells a tale of ordinary people seeking the extraordinary – or, if that’s asking too much, some damn peace of mind.
Thank You For Not ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén
throwdeuce
I’ll take the Royals last 27. The last 2 made up for the previous 25. Sorry but Division Titles aren’t enough for this Dodger fan.
Don Bright
Royals didn’t luck out, and will be relevant for a while
Dave Alden (@davealden53)
I’ll happily take the Dodgers’ 27 years. Near consistent relevance provides more engagement than stumbling into a lucky roll of the post-season dice. Looking forward for a decade, I’d take ten divisional titles and no crowns over nine sub-.500 finishes and one crown.
oldbrooklynfan
I didn’t follow the Royals that much but I wouldn’t change this time, following the Dodgers, with anything.
Michael Green
I find it interesting that Ned Yost is almost universally criticized for his managing … and yet somehow the players won. Hm.