Dodger Thoughts

Jon Weisman's outlet for dealing psychologically with the Los Angeles Dodgers, baseball and life

Ups and downs: Snapshots are not real life

Colorado Rockies at Los Angeles Dodgers

By Jon Weisman

When looking at a team whose fortunes are sinking, people are fond of moralizing and other snap judgments. If a team isn’t winning, it must not be trying. Or the team is just not good.

It takes backbone to see streaks as an exaggeration of reality, rather than a reflection of reality, even though almost by definition, streaks tend to be unusual.

We understand that batting averages and ERAs and every other statistic will fluctuate from week to week, month to month. Not one .333 hitter actually goes 1 for 3 in every game. Yet somehow, winning teams are expected to always be winning.

Having lost six of their past eight since matching a season-high five games over .500 on May 3, the Dodgers are drawing catcalls. It’s part of the game, I suppose. But we don’t know who the real Dodgers are.

Are they the team that started 9-4? The team that then went 9-9? Or the team that is most recently 2-6? Are they even the team that is 20-19 overall this season?

We have no idea. We can guess, but we don’t know.

SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS VS LOS ANGELES DODGERSSomeone recently commented, for example, that the Dodgers are a reflection of their manager. If that’s so, then their manager has been going through a series of costume changes in front of the mirror.

Here’s a comparison for you …

During the Dodgers’ instantly legendary 42-8 run last year, the bullpen pitch 133 1/3 innings with a 2.23 ERA, and allowed only eight inherited runners to score in those 50 games. It was, as much as any you’ll ever see, a shutdown bullpen.

So far in 2014, Dodger relievers have pitched 134 2/3 innings, almost exactly the number as they threw during the 42-8 stretch (though in noticeably fewer games). This time around, the bullpen has allowed a 3.94 ERA and 14 inherited runners to score. That’s not quite twice as much damage, but it’s close enough.

Last year, Dodger relievers only took 24 losses in 162 games. This year, Dodger relievers have already been charged with 11 losses in 39 games.

Is this significant, or an aberration? If last year’s bullpen didn’t continue to perform as well as it had been, should we assume this year’s will continue to be so challenged?

One other note on the 2014 relievers: They have faced 277 batters with the bases empty, and walked or hit 35 of them. In other words, 13 percent of the batters the Dodger bullpen has faced with nobody on, when the worst thing that could happen would be a solo home run, has gotten a free pass to first base. That rate is 60 percent higher than the MLB average in 2014. (It’s no coincidence, by the way, that Brandon League’s resurgence is accompanied by the fact that he has the best rate on the staff in this category: 40 batters with the bases empty, one walk).

It’s also a failing that, as failings go, seems highly correctable.

Will the Dodger bullpen struggle this much all year? We have no idea.

We do know that the Dodgers have a 1-5 record when tied after seven or eight innings. A 3-6 record in one-run games. A 3-7 record in extra innings. Against the Giants alone, the Dodgers are 0-3 in extras. Reverse that number, and the Dodgers would be 23-16 and in first place in the National League West.

Yeah, changing the past is easy to say and impossible to do. Maybe the recent losses are no accident. But really, really, we are still early enough in the season where we just don’t know.

Previous

18 Again! Ten years later, Alex Cora’s at-bat remains a wonder

Next

Interview: Matt Kemp talks about playing his 1,000th game

9 Comments

  1. I am hearing you as for the bullpen. but I am seeing a pattern of inconsistency in the middle of the lineup that is not connecting to produce runs…. This, after all, is a GREAT lineup, and needs to perform up to expectations…… if it does not, there will continue to be losses in extra inning games and close games in general. That will not bode well for Don Mattingly. This is a team that has big expectations… we shall see as the season progresses. BTW, It wasn’t until mid-june last year, right after the series with Yankees, that the Dodgers, who were playing hum drum baseball, suddenly started to gel in a big way…. That’s what I am counting on this year… .

  2. In the immortal words of that great Italian philosopher L.P. Berra: “It ain’t over till it’s over.”

  3. All of you Baseball lovers Ought to check this out. I came across it the other day. Definitely worth checking out. https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/little-league-on-a-little-island/x/6840136

  4. The fact that you are focusing on the bullpen is (IMHO) the primary reason the club is one game over 500. And I do believe that they can turn it around. Now the defense, that’s another problem. How do you fix that?

  5. Maybe the make-up this team is slow to the dance, due to ever changing personnel. Mainly new utility players, new platoons, new bullpen staff. Factor that in with lack of focus which breeds errors and mental mistakes and also lengthens the time spent on the field . Given time to adjust to the season and get their sea-legs so to speak, along with better focus, and I suspect we will see a different ball club?

  6. Well, those with Time Warner, MLB.tv or tickets to the games might see a different ball club. The rest of us will have to use our imaginations apparently!

  7. How do you fix that?

  8. The Dodgers are 10-8 against Arizona and San Fran (7-1 vs Ari, 3-7 vs SF), and 11-11 against all other teams they have played so far.

  9. oldbrooklynfan

    I agree, I could never understand these so call experts who say they are sure they know what’s going to happen. I’ve been following this team for over 66 years and all I’ve learned is I don’t know. I’m best at sticking to what just happened and give my thoughts on that .Right now the Dodgers are at 21-19 after 40 game mark and that’s the only stat that I’m sure of.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén